Tools

AI Interrogation Pressure Checklist

A mid-reply decision tree for tone: when to push evidence, when to hold, and when to soften.

Last updated:

AI Interrogation Pressure Checklist

Pressure checklist

Tick each item during the interrogation. If half stay unchecked by try 6, reset your angle.

Checks completed: 0 / 8

The pressure checklist is a rapid decision aid for AI Interrogation. After every AI reply, you spend five seconds classifying what happened, then choose escalate, hold, or soften. This prevents the two classic deaths: shutdown from being too mean, and timeout from being too nice. Use it with the question planner open.

The 10-second checklist

After each reply, answer these yes/no prompts:

  1. Did they give a new factual claim I can quote later?
  2. Did they dodge a named evidence piece?
  3. Did their tone go colder / shorter than last reply?
  4. Did they open a tangent (gear, drama, unrelated hobby)?
  5. Do I still have tries left for a real close (ideally 3+)?

Then pick an action from the table below.

Action table

SignalsActionNext ask style
New claim + no coldnessHold / slight escalateFollow-up detail or next evidence
Dodge of named proofEscalateRe-ask proof as yes/no
Colder / one-word answersSoftenNarrow neutral fact
Tangent baitRedirectYank back to brief location/object
Clean contradiction alreadyClose soonConfession demand
Tries ≤2 and no contradictionControlled hail-maryBest proof + close hybrid

Escalate correctly

Escalation means more specificity, not more insults. Examples:

  • “Answer the gas station question — yes or no.”
  • “You claimed X. The warehouse evidence says otherwise. Explain.”

Insult-only escalation causes shutdowns. Rank better asks in question strategies.

Soften correctly

Softening means shorter, calmer, factual — not apologizing forever.

  • “Let’s go back to where you were at 9.”
  • “I need one detail about the dumpster.”

If you soften for three tries straight with no proof, you are stalling. Re-enter pressure with evidence from the evidence priority list.

Redirect tangents (Case 005 critical)

When boots or dirtbike talk appears, do not debate the hobby. Redirect:

  • “Not asking about the bike. Were you at the gas station?”
  • “Boots aside — why were you seen running?”

Full route discipline: Case 005 Warehouse Fire.

Phase awareness

Try bandDefault bias
1–3Soft map, rare escalate
4–7Escalate on dodges
8–10Close if contradiction exists; else best proof

This matches how to play and interrogation strategies.

Worked micro-example

Reply: long charming alibi, ignores hammer.
Checklist: new claim yes, dodge yes, coldness no, tangent no, tries ok.
Action: escalate to hammer fingerprints (Marcus pattern from confession guide).

Reply: “…” / refusal.
Checklist: coldness yes.
Action: soften with one neutral timeline ask, then return to proof.

Pair with other pages

Voice checklist (optional)

Say the action out loud: “escalate,” “soften,” or “redirect.” Speaking the choice slows panic typing. It sounds silly until it saves a Case 005 run from a boots argument.

If you notice you always escalate, force two soften reps in a custom. If you always soften, force two proof escalations. The checklist is a mirror for your bias.

Run the checklist out loud if you have to. The goal is a conscious tone choice every try — not autopilot meanness or autopilot politeness — because both autopilots fail TrueTalk AI’s tone physics.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers for AI Interrogation detectives.

How often should I run the checklist?

After every reply before you type the next question.

What is the difference between escalate and insult?

Escalate cites proof and narrows the ask. Insults without proof cause shutdowns.

What do I do on tangents?

Redirect to brief facts. On Warehouse Fire, see Case 005.

Should I close if I am unsure?

Only if a contradiction already exists. Otherwise spend a proof try first.

Where do I prewrite asks?